Showing posts with label prayer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label prayer. Show all posts

Monday, February 27, 2012

Prayers That do NOT get Answered - Sermon Outline - Prayer Breakfast Message May 1, 2010

Prayer Breakfast May 1, 2010 7:30

Prayers that do not get answered.
1 Chron 29:19
God does not and will not manipulate UNsubmitted hearts even from his own people. God's transforming power works ONLY on SUBMITTED hearts. Otherwise, it violates God's preordained creation of man "in the image of God" which makes man autonomous, independent with unrestricted free will. So he answered David's prayer that Solomon would complete the temple but God did NOT answer the part where Solomon would be faithful to God with a whole heart. History is the evidence of this. Read: Prayer that God does not Answer

We don’t experience answered prayers because:

We don’t know what to believe
  1. Personal Theology is what you REALLY believe about God and how He deals with the world and how he deals personally with you.
  2. The chief end of man? According to Jesus Christ is to LOVE GOD with all your heart, mind, soul and strength.
  3. Bible is NOT a book about salvation or even giving God glory, but about God’s design for relationship with Him.
  4. God changes His mind. Hezekiah in Isaiah 38
  5. Most people, even renown pastors misinterpret the meaning of “according to His will” 1 John 5:14 vs 1 John 3:21, 22
  6. "Be it done to you according to your faith." Matt 9:29. Jesus Christ Himself declared this RULE.
Relate how our prayer delivered my father from death at the operating table during open heart surgery when the doctors already declared him dead or bleeding to death.
Relate how prayer for a Christian couple who could not bear children after months of their own church praying for them failed but bore fruit after exactly 9 months after our prayer
Relate how our missionary’s wife came to us for prayer after she was diagnosed with an artery blockage and confirmed by second opinion. The final exam just before the operation could not find the blockage and the stent operation was cancelled.
Relate how a friend with a brain tumor at a hospital in the Philippines thousands of miles away was miraculously healed after prayer and declared cancer free.

We are not in right covenant-relationship with God
  1. Covenant-relationship with God is the key to answered prayer. John 15; Psalm 37
  2. Sermon on the Mount is about the kingdom here and now. All prayers are answered and all of God's promises are fulfilled ONLY WITHIN the context of the Kingdom of God. The more we live in that context, the more we see fulfillment. The less we live in that context the more we see frustration and disappointment. That is God's plan and promise
Win the world to Christ by Who we are, not what we do
Being Christ to others

Other related topics:

Sunday, April 18, 2010

Prayer that God does NOT answer, NORMALLY

1 Chronicles 29 is a record of part of David's prayer for Israel and for Solomon. Of particular interest among other verses is 1 Chronicles 29:19 (NIV), which reads,

"...And give my son Solomon the wholehearted devotion to keep your commands, requirements and decrees and to do everything to build the palatial structure for which I have provided.""

Here is a prayer of David, a "man after God's own heart", the man whom God promised that his kingdom would never end. This is very significant since we are looking up to a God who answers prayer and this is a prayer from one of His own "favorites".

There are two distinct requests in this prayer:
  1. That God would give Solomon the "wholehearted devotion to keep your commands, etc, and
  2. That God would give Solomon the "wholehearted devotion...to do everything to build" the temple.
If we know Bible history well, we see that the second part of David's prayer was granted almost without any obstacles. The assignment of people and slaves, the wholehearted cooperation of and importing of cedar from King Hiram of Tyre and all other logistics in terms of the availability of goldsmiths, carpenters, engineers, and other artisans needed for the flawless construction of the temple according to specifications.

In stark contrast to the second request is the first one. We know that Solomon started well, asking the Lord for wisdom to rule God's people but was granted not only wisdom but riches in the superlative as well. We also know quite well that Solomon did not follow through towards the end of his life, he got involved and even immersed in idolatry and other things, this man who is credited with writing most of the book of Proverbs, the Song of Solomon and Ecclesiastes.

Our question now is, "Did God give Solomon that wholehearted devotion to obey God's commands like David requested or prayed for?" The answer, unfortunately but quite biblically is Yes AND No. For the perfectionists, like the classical theologians, this is equivalent to "No". However, based on our covenant-relationship theology, the correct and biblical answer is BOTH, Yes and No, and that does not contradict the perfection of God at all.

So, WHY, we ask, did God completely answer the 2nd request but not the first request? What is inherently different between the two requests KNOWING that the God who answered the 2nd part of David's prayer is THE SAME GOD who did not seem to exactly answer the 1st request? Note also that the petitioner, David, was "a man after God's own heart", the same man. So, where lies the difference?

The answer goes back to God creating man in His image, autonomous with free will (and implicitly, what God imposed upon Himself to respect His own work and limit any exceptions to His foreordained laws). The answer is not surprising to those who see the Bible as a relationship book and not just a salvation book. The answer is obvious to those who accept covenant-relationship theology but forever a mystery to the classical theologian who continues to wallow in their own Hellenistic presuppositions about God.

The building of the temple had very little if at all to do with God manipulating man's will and man's heart. Hence, this is not only easy for God to perform, but it is something He delights to do. Miracles of healing, divine intervention in world and personal affairs, and even the raising of the dead, fall in this category. They have nothing to do with divine interference in God's own design of creating man in His image, a creature with independent will and heart that God has surrendered control over in the creation. In other word, God does not have to perform divine magic (by force) on man's heart and will, or divine heart-twisting. Note that God called Israel to rend their hearts and not their garments. Why? Precisely because God will not interfere with man's heart. Man's entire action should be based on his own independent will to desire and to do. That is the divine implication of creating man in God's image.

On the other hand, the first request of David could only allow God to participate in Solomon's affairs by courting him to do according to God's will and David's request. God WOULD not (note that I did not say COULD NOT) twist Solomon's heart for any reason. God would only court or encourage Solomon (this is God's version of tempting) to do His will. This same thing happened to Job. Note that Satan does not have the ability to twist man's heart by divine design. Hence Satan only tempts (which is his version of encouragement and courting).

God ordained at creation that the battle between good and evil would ultimately redound to the battle of winning hearts. In another blog, God's "Trial-and-Error" Attempts to Create a People of Faith for His Kingdom, I explained that the divine purpose for creating man boils down to God's desire to create a people of faith who willing love Him back and are willingly surrendered to His will.

God embedded free will as one of man's attributes when man was created in His image. His delight is when man gladly and willingly surrenders back that free will to God. Why? Because God ordained at the creation an attribute that He would surrender control over in order for it to be genuine. Love and devotion cannot be forced or faked. God desires genuine love. That is the essence of the Greatest commandment which is mentioned at least once in the Old Testament and at least three times in the Gospels.

God greatly, supremely delights in His children who love God with ALL their heart, ALL their soul, ALL their mind and ALL their strength precisely because He has ordained NOT to control it and therefore gives Him great joy when given by His kingdom children willingly.

To summarize, the answer is YES, God granted David's prayer by creating all the encouragement He allowed Himself to give to court Solomon's heart. However, the answer is NO because Solomon did not end well. When all was said and done, Solomon still had his own independent free will intact. What a 180 degree biblical contradiction to the classical concept of divine election and perseverance!!!

Here is a rhetorical point which, I admit, I have a biblical answer to but just refuse to preempt God's mercy vs. God's justice and judgment. If Calvinists propose that Solomon is in heaven anyway because he was "elected" ( fore-ordained, anointed, crowned), then all Christians would begin to lose the motivation to be holy in this life. Roman 6 would become a complete joke (God FORBID!) instead of a profound theological tenet. The Bible does say that Solomon turned away his heart from God (1 Kings 11:4,9) I would personally be surprised if I see King Solomon and King Saul in heaven because both of them demonstrated apostasy at the end of their lives DESPITE ELECTION.

It would be an object lesson to find out in heaven that you may be the greatest early king in history (Solomon) or the very first king of a chosen people (Saul) but it doesn't amount to a "hill of beans" in heaven.

If God did that, then for Him to be fair, we should also see all the other anointed but idolatrous and apostate kings of Israel and Judah in heaven. Would you believe that unconditional election will also make us see King Ahab in heaven? May God's will be followed and not mine. May His mercy prevail and not my logic.

Another profound lesson we can get from this is that we all have the God-ordained power to interfere with God's will for us. Hence, willing submission to God is of utmost importance to be partakers of God's joy and blessings.

May this thought encourage us to gladly surrender our free will to God moment by moment. That is the essence of surrendering to His will.


Other related topics:

Monday, May 4, 2009

When God Delays

The following is an outline of the Sunday message I gave at CrossCulture on April 19, 2008 on the death and temporary resurrection of Lazarus.

Title: When God Delays
Text: John 11:1-46
Supporting Text: Mark 5:22-43; Mark 4:35-41

God delays even after we pray. 6,12,21,39
cf. Jairus Mk 5:35;
At Sea Mk 4:37-38 - Even when Jesus is in the boat, storms may come. However, the problem-solver is in the boat with you.

God shows the basis of our faith may not be enough. 14,17,24-27,40
cf Jairus Mk 5:36-37, 39-40;
At Sea Mk 4:38,40-41 - The disciples knew to wake up Jesus so He could help empty the boat of water. They had faith but NOT that Jesus can calm the storm.
Gen 26-famine - God has a promise/goal and He leads us to it but rarely in a straight line. God's higher goal is for us to get to know Him intimately foremost.
Gen 41 famine vs. Manna in the Sinai desert. Will God solve everything and we just harvest the results? or does God want us to deliberately prepare (lots of human effort) for a situation He is bringing about?
We might have the right faith but the wrong scope of what God can do. We believe that God can heal but do we believe that God can raise the dead?

God experiences the same pain we do. John 11:35; Isaiah 63:9

God demonstrates a greater miracle. 43-44
cf Jairus Mk 5:41-43; At Sea Mk 4:39

God increases our faith as we witness that He can do greater things than we thought. 45-46
cf At Sea Mk 4:40-41

Sometimes, God wants us to stop praying and just start putting His will into action:
Exodus 14:15-16 - Stop praying and start taking action
Josh 7:10-11 - Stop praying and deal with sin first

Other related topics:

Sunday, December 21, 2008

Natural Law is God's ordinance

Reference: Jeremiah 31:35, 36; 33:25 NKJV

What is Natural Law? What is its role in God's participation in His relationship with His people?

Natural Laws are what the New King James Bible calls "ordinances". These are physical or metaphysical routines or behavior that have been ordained and established by God. Gravity is one example. The orbit of planets in the solar system and the exact distances between celestial bodies so that there is very little, if ever, possibility of collision between the planets are another example.

Other examples are consequences of events. For example, heavy rain clouds mean the high probability of rain. If the temperatures were at freezing point or below, we would have falling snow or hail instead. Two cars driving directly into each others way will collide head-on.

Less obvious examples are consequences of behavior. Too much refined sugar or high-fructose corn syrup in one's regular diet would lead to diabetes or other metabolic syndrome diseases like hypertension or even arthritis. An overdose of aspirin, sleeping pills and alcohol could lead to death.

Now, you may ask, what is the point of discussing the above and others like them?

The answer is a key to understanding the biblical perspective on answered prayers and rejected prayers.

Prayer is a petition to the God who ordains these natural laws or these divine ordinances, to intervene into the natural course of events as he originally ordained and, by such intervention, to change the course of events into something that is favorable to the petitioner. It is obvious that petitional prayers or prayers of supplication seek to change the mind of God either by altering His natural law or by simply changing the natural course of events had He left things alone as He originally ordained them.

This is such an important concept to bear in mind of a Christian who claims to have a real relationship with God. The petitioner needs to know if he is requesting something that would please God and honor Him, or is the petition tantamount to tempting or testing God in a negative sense.

Let me explain. Does God give us privilege to seek healing for a man born blind? or for a leper? or for a demon-possessed person? or for a child bitten by a venomous snake either due to the child's carelessness or adult negligence? In most cases, I would tend to think so, and I believe that the petitioner is in a strong position with the loving God to expect a favorable response.

On the other hand, similar to the Israelites continually tempting God in the wilderness during the Exodus years, does a Christian have the right to ask God for strong lungs if he is a habitual smoker? Can he petition for a healthy liver and kidney if he is a drunkard? Can a Christian who overdoses on alcohol and sleeping pills ask for a long life? More subtly, can a Christian who habitually stuffs herself with refined sugar diets and high fructose corn syrup juices have the right to ask God to heal her from diabetes?

In such cases, I think that these are patterns for prayers that will be rejected by God. In the same way that God wants us to reckon ourselves dead to sin in order to be alive to God, the above scenarios require a drastic lifestyle change before God can even begin to deliberate on the petitioner's case!

It is important for a Christian in relationship with God to realize the strength of his petitions based on what he has been doing with or against the natural laws of God before he even begins to make request for divine intervention. Christians who continually and stubbornly defy these ordinances, e.g., the cult where they play with poisonous snakes in their rituals should not expect any response from God at all. These are all part of "turn from their wicked ways" before God can "hear from heaven and heal their land" (2 Chronicles 7:14). This could be another angle in understanding what it is to pray "according to His will".

On the other hand, we must realize that natural law is something we NEVER have to pray for. Gravity will be gravity without our prayers. A man jumping from the top of the empire state building does not need to pray to God in order to land somewhere down below. We never need to pray that the planets in our solar system will not collide. They just won't until God decides to end everything. We don't need to pray that the ground gets wet when it rains.

Hence, petitional prayer is essentially a request for divine intervention for God to change the natural course of events in our favor.

...to be continued...
Other related topics:

Friday, August 22, 2008

Relational Prayer that gets Answers vs. the Vending Machine God

To be discussed:

Asking vs. Obedience.
Faith speakers emphasize asking. The Bible emphasizes obedience=love.

There is a context for answered prayer in Scripture:
  1. Relationship with God
  2. Faith according to your understanding of the Word and the Holy Spirit's illumination

Relationship:
Kingdom-mindedness in Matt 7:7-11
Abiding in the Vine John 15, 16
Understanding and knowing God like Elijah in James 5

When it comes to healing, if God does not get the credit, divine healing rarely occurs. There is truth to the saying that "Man's extremity is God's opportunity".

"Be it done according to your faith". Does your reading of Scripture lead you to importunate prayer with God like David did for his son's life? or does it lead you to resign and accept whatever God has dispensed your way? "Be it done according to your faith".

Other related topics:

Tuesday, June 24, 2008

Praying According to God's Will - The Right and Wrong Interpretations

What did John really mean in 1 John 5:14 when he said God hears us "if we ask anything according to His will..."?

This is the only exact greek instance for
κατα το θελημα αυτου
according to his will,
κατά θέλημα αὐτός
2596 3588 2307 846
P TASN NASN RP-GSM

The only other passage in the NT that translates to this phrase uses a different Greek word for "according" and is found in Luke 12:47:
προς το θελημα αυτου
according to his will,
πρός θέλημα αὐτός
4314 3588 2307 846
P TASN NASN RP-GSM

Lest we be guilty of splitting hairs here, we accept that they are the same and so are the contexts in which they are used.

Most interpretations of this passage in Scripture turn out to be classical and useless for practical applications. The phrase, "according to His will" is meant to say "according to His prescribed manner of conduct" but most commentaries state "according to His purpose" and is subsequently distorted by Greek scholastic thought. They are viewed and subsequently interpreted from the viewpoint of a Hellenist Gentile instead of a Jew in a Hellenistic environment. Perspective makes all the difference in the world for good and true hermeneutics.

It is true that the Bible was written for the whole world to understand. However, there are nuances of language and context that can only be properly dissected using the right perspective. One has to put himself in the shoes of the "immediate" author and audience of the scripture context. John was one of those "uneducated" fisherman who captured the heart of Jesus and was called the "Beloved" disciple.

John's lack of formal Hellenistic education much less Jewish education is key here. John must have only learned from the Rabbi's the "simple" truths of the Torah. John later learned from the Greatest Communicator, Jesus Christ, the unfolding revelation of His heart. Note that in Acts 1:3, Jesus spent 40 days with His inner circle of disciples in His resurrected body to open and break forth the mysteries of the Kingdom of God. Note also that John's learning process could not have been, in any way shape or form, distorted by Hellenistic thought during these 40 days. God forbid, and Jesus would have seen to that! Yes, they were using Aramaic or Koine Greek to communicate but this was the common "street" or "market" Greek. This was the Greek for and of the uneducated (Hellenistically speaking).

That is how we should approach the interpretation of Scripture whether Old Testament or New Testament...through Jewish eyes.

According to a classical interpretation of this passage, we can only pray what is in the purpose of God and that pupose is fixed and unmovable. Hence, our prayers can only be "heard" by God within a narrow scope of requests. If you analyze this interpretation, it does not mean anything sensible or practical other than an expression of Hellenistic philosophy. Hellenistic philosophy always ends up with almost everything about God being a mystery, EVEN WHEN IT HAS ALREADY BEEN REVEALED IN SCRIPTURE! Talk about the blindness of wisest of man and the wisdom of the world being mere foolishness to God. This is one example.

How often do we hear classical prayers utter, "if it be Your will..." and it degrades to a prayer of unbelief. Classicists would cross-reference this with phrases like, "if the Lord wills..." (1 Corinthians 4:19) or "God willing" (Acts 18:21). They are further intimidated and limited by the warning from James 4:15, "Instead you ought to say, “If the Lord wills, we shall live and do this or that.” ". But these statements are related to plans and not prayers. The attitude we ought to have when we declare our plans should be different from the expression of our inner desires and longings when we are on our knees before our Loving Heavenly Father. Prayer is where we can let ourselves go and come as we are before God, open and candid but with godly fear and reverence.

Let us look at two key cross references for the phrase, "according to His will". The first will be the other exact "english" translation passage of Luke 12:47.

The Luke 12 parable of Jesus illustrates one alternative meaning of the phrase. Here is the definition of Enhanced Strong's Lexicon:

[
2307 θέλημα [thelema /thel·ay·mah/] n n. From the prolonged form of 2309; TDNT 3:52; TDNTA 318; GK 2525; 64 occurrences; AV translates as “will” 62 times, “desire” once, and “pleasure” once. 1 what one wishes or has determined shall be done. 1a of the purpose of God to bless mankind through Christ. 1b of what God wishes to be done by us. 1b1 commands, precepts. 2 will, choice, inclination, desire, pleasure.
Strong, J. (1996). The exhaustive concordance of the Bible : Showing every word of the text of the common English version of the canonical books, and every occurrence of each word in regular order. (electronic ed.) (G2307). Ontario: Woodside Bible Fellowship.
]

"1b of what God wishes to be done by us." This is the closest to the sense of the phrase and passage which is the object of our study.

The servant was guilty of not following the mandate of proper conduct by his master and "shall be beaten with many stripes". Note that this mandate of proper conduct is fixed by his master and yet he still had the free will not to comply. Reward and punishment is a result of his behavior and his behavior alone. Reward and punishment had little to do with the mandate apart from setting a guideline.

Likewise when we "ask anything according to His will", that means we come to God with our petitions with the right heart ("pure in heart", Matthew 5:8), the right spirit (we are the branches constantly abiding in and completely dependent on the Vine, John 15:5), conscious that we are standing on holy ground and knowing that "without faith it is impossible to please God" (Hebrews 11:6). In other words, we approach God in the context of a covenant relationship knowing that we have fulfilled our part of the covenant so that He is moved to fulfill His part in a relevant way to us.

Recall that in the OT, God issued a series of blessings for faithfulness, and curses for disobedience to His own chosen people the Jews (Deuteronomy 28-30). Recall also that the seven churches in Asia in the first 3 books of the Revelation received its own dose of verbal commendations and warnings of curses and judgment (Revelation 2,3).

Covenant relationship is God-initiated-and-signed but is two-way. God explicitly declares that He will fulfill His end of the covenant if we are faithful to fulfill our end. There is absolutely no middle ground or fence-sitting in the covenant. Hence, God is NOT a vending machine to get what we want when we need it. However, God DOES promise to grant us anything when we are in fulfillment of our covenant relationship with Him, and God DOES NOT and CANNOT lie!

The 2nd passage that will help explain the meaning and context of God's will (thelema) comes from The Lord's Prayer in Matthew 6:10. Here is a plea for God's will to be done. That plea does not make sense if God's will would be done anyway without that plea. So the concept of the unchangeable and unmovable will of God in many ways is Hellenistic and unbiblical (even non-sensible). We are not talking about the absolute and ultimate will of God for all of creation and man, here. We are simply talking about day to day prayer items. There is no reason for anyone, classicism, especially to apply God's absolute will on any item in this world that has to do with His will and even purpose.

In fact, the prayer for God's will to be "done on earth as it is in heaven" is a plea to do His will quickly, and that was prayed over 2,000 years ago and has been prayed millions of times in various ways ever since. So even to interpret it in a generalized sense does not make sense at all. From a simple mind approach, that prayer illustrated by Jesus really meant that it is our prayer that we taste a little of heaven on earth that applies to our immediate situation. And that my friends has been answered by God millions of times as well, but only when we come to Him in prayer, "according to His will" as interpreted in this blog.

I believe such interpretation shows the difference when we read the Bible with a simple, Hellenistically "uneducated" mind like John, from a Jewish perspective compared to a Classical Hellenistic "educated", but philosophically-distorted viewpoint.

Finally, the best explanation of the concept of "according to His will" comes from the very same person and author, John himself. In 1 John 3:21,22, he writes,

"21 Beloved, if our heart does not condemn us, we have confidence toward God. 22 And whatever we ask we receive from Him, because we keep His commandments and do those things that are pleasing in His sight."

Now let us talk Greek for a moment. The Greek word for confidence is this verse is exactly the same as 1 John 5:14, parresis, meaning courage or boldness. The Greek word for "ask" even connotes "demand" aside from request but is used in the Greek more for demand than request. It means to ask for with urgency, even to the point of demanding. Not only are we to have boldness in approaching God but we can almost demand with due respect to His Deity. The Greek word, in fact, is used when requesting something of someone more superior...and yet it hints of demand?

Note also that the word for "know" in 1 John 15:15 comes from the Greek word "oida" in contrast to "gnosis". Although they are often used interchangeably, they have different flavors depending on context. gnosis speaks of knowing as a result of seeing or observation while oida actually speaks of understanding of the process and inner workings of its object. Isn't that fascinating that "uneducated" but "inspired" John picked that word!

John was actually talking about getting assurance that our prayerful requests are truly answered in a timely (sometimes, immediate) and relevant manner.

Let us recap what we said earlier.

When we "ask anything according to His will", that means we come to God with our petitions with the right heart ("pure in heart", Matthew 5:8, or according to John, "if our heart does not condemn us,"), the right spirit (we are the branches constantly abiding in and completely dependent on the Vine, John 15:5), conscious that we are standing on holy ground and knowing that "without faith it is impossible to please God" (Hebrews 11:6). In other words, we approach God in the context of a covenant relationship knowing that we have fulfilled our part of the covenant so that He is moved to fulfill His part in a relevant way to us.

Let us now address a specific passage of Scripture which on the surface seems troublesome and contradictory to what we just proposed. Observe the story of leper Jesus healed in Matthew 8:1-3:

1 When He had come down from the mountain, great multitudes followed Him. 2 And behold, a leper came and worshiped Him, saying, “Lord, if You are willing, You can make me clean.”
3 Then Jesus put out His hand and touched him, saying, “I am willing; be cleansed.” Immediately his leprosy was cleansed.

Now, one would ask, "Isn't this a literal example of praying according to God's will?". The leper did say, "Lord, if you are WILLING...", right? Rewind for a moment, take a step back and let us see this from the viewpoint of relational theology.

The leper, before he met Jesus, had almost no relationship with Jesus. Hence, he is an "outsider" and should pray like an outsider! The same is true for a Christian that prays that way, he only betrays that fact that there is something lacking or missing in his relationship with God which is why he could pray that way. It is a prayer of uncertainty. It is a prayer of no-faith, if you will.

Let us now examine the Lord's response to the leper. "I am WILLING!" Yes, it is a Biblical fact that God is ALWAYS WILLING! It is a principle in His nature. An good analogy is what St. Peter said in 2 Peter 3:9:

"The Lord is not slack concerning His promise, as some count slackness, but is longsuffering toward us, not willing that any should perish but that all should come to repentance."

The Lord is not willing that any should perish BUT MANY HAVE PERISHED!!!
Applying this to prayer and/or healing, the Lord is willing to heal but many are NOT HEALED; The Lord is willing to ANSWER PRAYER but many prayers are NOT answered at all, and... for exactly the SAME reason that many perish...THEY DO NOT BELIEVE! THEY DO NOT HAVE FAITH! Because, they do NOT have a REAL RELATIONSHIP with the Living God! No ifs, buts, or other excuses!

The prayer of faith is different and the difference is night vs. day!
The Bible clearly declares in the last testament of Christ before He faced the cross, starting in John 15 and following that if we are in relationship with Him and behave like the branches abiding in the Vine (i.e., in such an attached and vital relationship with God), Jesus GUARANTEED that if we ask ANYTHING in His Name, he will respond with solid answers...so that your joy may be full! Read it again! You may have missed it because you were reading with the wrong lens.

May you pray according to His will indeed, so that your prayers get heard!
May your prayers be rewarding and always answered in covenant relationship with God!

Other related topics:

Sunday, June 22, 2008

Theology and "...according to your Faith..."

"According to your faith be it unto you." - Matthew 9:29

Matthew 9:27-29 (NIV) is a lesson packed story on the application of faith in a believer's life.

" 27As Jesus went on from there, two blind men followed him, calling out, "Have mercy on us, Son of David!"
28When he had gone indoors, the blind men came to him, and he asked them, "Do you believe that I am able to do this?"
"Yes, Lord," they replied.
29 Then he touched their eyes and said, "According to your faith will it be done to you"; 30 and their sight was restored. Jesus warned them sternly, "See that no one knows about this." 31But they went out and spread the news about him all over that region."
Note that we have been very passionate about teaching the rudiments, essentials and tenets of Relational Theology. We have gone through great lengths to refute and "almost" condemn classical theology as mostly irrelevant to living a vital relationship with God, and which is the road that Calvinism has taken with great names like Augustine, Thomas Aquinas in the list even preceeding John Calvin himself.
However, it is important to note that in the ultimate analysis, because our "complete" understanding of the infinite God will always be incomplete in this life, we have to make the warning that peripheral issues like these are things we can passionately disagree on and whether or not one is right and the other is wrong does not mostly affect one's road to salvation (although it may affect how one end's up finally saved or not!???).
Nevertheless, in this life, the words of Christ ring true. Although it matters little cardinally what a believer believes peripherally, it matters much how his beliefs are applied to reality and his life's journey on earth.
It will be done to us exactly ACCORDING TO OUR FAITH. If we believe that God never changes His mind in response to our prayers, so will it be done to you. If you believe that you can never persuade God in your prayes, so will it be done to you precisely "according to your faith". Your prayers will NEVER be answered since God will not change His mind for you anyway. If you believe that all God wants is to get glory for Himself from us, so will it be done to you. Since God's getting glory has really nothing to do with you, you will have to live a life that is satisfied with everything God dispenses your way, good and bad and just accept it.
For those of us who are relational, however, when we find ourselves in a bind, we plead with God because we believe God has a heart and will change His mind according to our requests WHEN WE ARE IN Covenant RELATIONSHIP WITH HIM CONSTANTLY ABIDING, then so will it be done to us according to our faith. God WILL respond. If we believe that we can persuade God the same as David's belief (and theology) when he pled for the life of his first son by Bathsheba, or better yet like the importunate widow and the unjust judge in Luke 18:1-8. I emphasize verse 8:
"I tell you, he will see that they get justice, and quickly. However, when the Son of Man comes, will he find faith on the earth?"
I have personally been a witness several times of divine intervention even up to the point of death. My father-in-law underwent triple bypass heart surgery with a valve replacement at the young age of 90. What was supposed to be a 4 day confinement ended up to be 5 weeks. Just when he was going to be released on the 4th day, he had a heart attack of some sort which the doctors never finally determined (perhaps because they may have been so embarrassed at the way things turned out). Embarrassed because, they declared him fit to leave the hospital on the 4th day and that did not go right. Embarrased because he was flat line for 23 minutes and the attending physicians told us to give him up for dead but we refused because we said that God answers prayer and even if it was supposed to be his time to go, we could still move the hands of God through prayer (remember Hezekiah in Isaiah 38?). Embarrased because they said that if he survived the flat line he would be a vegetable anyway and at 96 he is still laughing with us as of this writing. Embarrassed because he was 8 hours in a coma at the Intensive Care Unit and they were still waiting for him to die. Embarrassed because when he awoke after my wife said good-bye to him for the night, he was fully conversant as if he just woke from a normal sleep.
A month later my own father had congestive heart failure. We met as a family because the only solution the doctors would give is a triple-bypass and valve replacement surgery. He was 83 and we encouraged him with the results of my father-in-laws own ordeal at age 90. What was supposed to be a 5 hour operation turned into 8 hours. For 5 hours, he was bleeding to death. The heart membranes would tear as soon as the doctors tried to suture a new valve into place. One after the other, the surgeon told us there was nothing they could do to save him. The heart surgeon himself went down to us at the waiting area to tell us that he was just going to die on the operating table and asked us if we wanted to view him there to say our last farewells. I thanked the good doctor, but specifically told him that we were a praying family who believed that God answers prayer and that if he could do his best to keep him alive, we would do our best to move God's hands through prayer. He seemed an unbeliever but doctors normally humor their clients request especially if they believe it would be the last request made.
I phoned my wife and kids, my mother, my brother in Canada to inform them to prepare for the worst. But I told them it was not over yet and there was room for us to knock on the doors of heaven to get to God's heart and tell him what we really desire to happen.
After telling us to wait for 20 minutes so the heart surgeon could prepare my dad's sedated body with the chest still open (they could not close it because the swelling from blood substitute products to replace the blood he was losing), 20 minutes turned into 30 minutes and 30 minutes turned into 45 minutes and then 1 hours and then after 15 more minutes, the surgeon popped his bewildered head into our waiting room. We looked each other in the eye for what he was about to say, but all he could utter was that the bleeding had stopped while he was preparing my dad's body for viewing. So he shifted gears and actually prepared my Dad to go to the ICU.
My sister who was with me is a graduate of Medicine and all of us in the room knew what the doctor meant. We were so elated, we didn't know what to say but we did not forget to thank God and the doctor for doing his best to save my dad (instead of giving up completely). At 89, my dad still drives for errands to the groceries and he and my mom are living alone but close to my sisters' homes. We are still enjoying his fellowship and his company.
God dealt with us ACCORDING TO OUR FAITH. What if we just surrendered to the natural consequences of failed operations or surgeries? Yes, we could do that. We could just accept what God has dispensed to us and "surrendered to His will" and there is absolutely nothing theologically and Biblically wrong with that position. However, both my Dad and Father-in-law would have long passed away if that were our position because God would deal with us ACCORDING TO OUR FAITH, most of the time, nothing more and nothing less.
Why do I say this? Because God is a relational God. He framed two covenants to illustrate that - the Old Testament (covenant) and the New Testament. He desires to interact with us on a real and personal level and the only way that can happen is if He releases absolute control over many things (which means He takes quite a few risks for our sakes). That means we can pray and plead. That means, like in the case of Hezekiah and Jonah with the people of Ninevah, He can relent (Hebrew, literally, change His mind about a previous decision) if it were His will and then change it in our favor.
What a wonderful God! He doesn't have to do it. He could refuse to take any risks. BUT...He loves! and true love entails risk. Glory, Hallelujah!!! Amen! God is Love. His lovingkindness is without limit,
"Your mercy, O LORD, is in the heavens;
Your faithfulness reaches to the clouds." - Psalm 36:5.
Were these isolated incidents? Was I just lucky? God forbid! Only an infidel could say such a thing! I have prayed for a friend about to undergo angioplasty only to have her appointments cancelled because the blockage could not be found after our prayer! Note that the initial diagnosis had to be confirmed with 2nd opinions and it was verified.
I have prayed for a couple who had a miscarriage and had difficulty having a baby. Their own church prayed for them without success. What was the difference? We believed that it would be done according to our faith! We assured the couple that God was a relational God despite everything they may have been taught (or mistaught!). That God was the same yesterday, today and forever. That God desires to be in relationship with His people and that His people need to be in the same mode needing God, wanting God, desiring His presence, hungry to seek His face constantly. In relationship with God as the branch abides in the vine, the promise of Christ holds true, "Ask anything and it shall be done".
It took only 9 months to prove that God responds in relationship and they are now enjoying their baby boy. There were absolutely no issues with the pregnancy despite all those doctors warnings because of the prior miscarriages. They are enjoying as of this writing, their healthy baby.
Today we are still experiencing God's responses to our prayers according to our faith. Oh, believer, please DO NOT lose out on the goodness of God. Whatever your previous beliefs, launch out on this new adventure with the God which perhaps you have never known this way...God is truly relational. He is a real person.
I've had an old classmate who was at the hospital preparing for surgery for a brain tumor half-way around the globe. I pled with God for her. Her surgery didn't go through because the tumor disappeared! Perhaps it was not just my prayer. Perhaps others were praying for her the RIGHT way too. But this is too much of a coincidence. She was already in the hospital room getting prepared for the surgery, which means that there were already 2nd, 3rd opinions on her tumor. Then there is the final scan before the actual surgery...and there was no tumor!
I have another friend, a medical doctor who is dealing with His own lung cancer. I tried to admonish him to refuse both chemotheraphy and radiation not because I was like those Christian Scientists who do not believe in medicine, but because I have read medical research and journals that prove that there is no statistical difference between those who get these treatments and those who don't (I am a mathematician, by the way, and statistics do NOT lie!). In fact, it will only weaken his immune system and lessen his capacity to fight any disease and even the cancer itself if it recurs, not to mention all the side-effects that make even most oncologists unwilling to undergo the procedure themselves were they or their loved ones to be stricken with cancer).
All I wanted was to spare him the agony. I wanted to suggest that he get treatments in Mexico or Germany which have better success with cancer treatments in a less invasive and toxic way, but I did not want to confuse him at his time of need so I kept quiet. Right now, I have a hard time praying for him, not because I have unbelief, but because he is further subjecting himself to worsen his case. It is like tempting God. "Lord, heal me. I am going to make it worse for me so you can heal me". Well, if he ever gets healed, guess who will get the glory? Will it be God or the toxic theraphies that he is going through. I believe people will glorify these cancer treatments instead of God and hence it is hard to pray to God for something where His work will be completely overshadowed by human effort.
In such cases, if he is granted deliverance from God, it will be despite everything bad he has allowed to be done to himself. However, it is doubtful that God will get the glory here and that is what makes me struggle to pray for him. When God does not get glory, He rarely answers or responds to prayer.
My only assurance is that it will be done to him --- ACCORDING TO HIS FAITH. If he believes that God will heal him through his cancer treatments, then perhaps God will. Unfortunately, I just do not see any concrete Biblical assurance for this where I can hang my faith on.
In the case of those Christian Scientists who "killed" their son suffering from diabetic attacks, note that they were a cult and have the wrong belief and hence the wrong God - an idol that they themselves created. Hence, the child died. This is both Bibilical and natural. They had a god with no ears or heart or life.
But we believe in the God of the Bible. The God of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Joseph, Samuel, David - - - the RELATIONAL and loving God!!! The God who is the same yesterday, today and forever! The God who has "no shadow of turning" according to James.
He loves you and will NOT impose His will upon you under normal circumstances, so...IT SHALL BE DONE TO YOU ACCORDING TO YOUR FAITH!
Other related topics:

Tuesday, April 8, 2008

Sermon Outline: Moving the Hands of God through Prayer – Part 2

Perspective

The chief end of man is not just to glorify God and enjoy Him forever. This is the classical view.
The Biblical view is that given by Jesus as the Greatest Commandment which has 2 parts.
Matt 22:37-40; Mark 12:29-31; Luke 10:27

  • Love God – with all your heart, soul, mind, and strength
  • Love your neighbor – as you love yourself.
Our Goal at CrossCulture is to know God better. In so knowing Him to be able to worship and love Him with all our heart, mind, soul and strength. In doing so, God gets the glory and we enjoy Him. And our joy overflows enough to compel us to love our neighbor and to share Christ with others.

Prayer

What is your general attitude and expectation about Prayer?
1 & 2 Samuel  – Background.

  • Judges to Seer-Prophet – God’s choice
  • Judges to Kings – Man’s choice
1 Samuel 1 – will enable us to know Him a little better and to enjoy knowing Him
Everytime we get to know something more about God, it should inspire us to both love and enjoy Him
  • God closed her womb (v.6) – God has the ability to do what we normally presume to be bad or even “evil” things or actions.
    • I Samuel 2:6,7
    • Isaiah 45:7
    • Exodus 4:11
    • “Acts of God” in insurance waivers or disclaimers are normally "evil" disasters.
  • God wants her to ask (v.10,-16). God wants to show that He is a responsive God.
Pouring my soul
    • 1 John 5: 14 –“According to His will” simply means praying for something that does not contradict God's design or pervert His word. It is often misinterpreted fatalistically as "God will answer if it is His will" which is a meaningless oxymoron and definitely NOT the way God wants us to understand it. People who use and believe it wrongly, rarely get answers to prayer because it is like saying you want something from God but you since you don't know His will, you are not sure if He will answer. (Read  Praying According to God's Will - The Right and Wrong Interpretations and  Theology and "...according to your Faith...")
      • John 14:13,14
      • John 15:7
      • John 16:23,24
      • John 16:26,27 – relationship
      • Matthew 7:7-11
      • James 4:2,3 – You have not because you ask not.
    • Hezekiah in Isaiah  38 and 2 Kings 18
  • God wants her to make a special vow (v.11)
    • This is a special dispensation for her because God had already pre-determined that he would change the leadership of Israel from judges to Seer-Prophet-Bible author (1 Samuel 2:35)
    • Normally it is not advisable to make an oath or vow. 
      • Numbers 30
      • Ecclesiastes 5:4-6
    • Jephthah – Judges 11:30ff
    • Saul – I Samuel 14:24,28 –
    • 1 Samuel 14: 37ff - violated vow stops God from responding to prayer
  • God wants her to worship, love and enjoy Him
    • (v. 18-20) - Peace and assurance of answered prayer even before it is actually granted or realized
    • Hannah fulfilled her vow (v.22,28)
    • Hannah experienced the joy of the Lord and the joy of fulfillment
      • (v.24-28) – remember to bring an offering to the Lord every time your petitions are actually granted by God
      • (2:1-10) – Hannah did not forget to thank and praise the Lord
      • (2:20-21) – 3 more sons and 2 daughters + the honor of being the mother of Samuel, the last judge, the first Prophet-Seer, anointer of King Saul and King David. Jesus, was called Son of David.
Other related topics:

Sunday, January 6, 2008

Relational Theology Makes Prayer Meaningful

Prayer has meaning ONLY with the underlying assumption that it CAN change the mind and actions of God Himself. Otherwise, it becomes a dull, senseless ritual that is devoid of any value whatsoever; as worthless as a "sounding brass or a a clanging cymbal". It has as much substance as the all-day chantings of the prophets of Baal at Mt. Carmel. It is all bark and no bite. It is play-acting with the only goal of trying to impress God (as if we even can!).

[Karl Barth, the 20th-century theologian who pounded home the theme of God's sovereignty, saw no contradiction at all in a God who chooses to let prayers affect him.]

"He is not deaf, he listens; more than that, he acts. He does not act in the same way whether we pray or not. Prayer exerts an influence upon God's action, even upon his existence. That is what the word 'answer' means. ... The fact that God yields to man's petitions, changing his intentions in response to man's prayer, is not a sign of weakness. He himself, in the glory of his majesty and power, has so willed it.”

Relational Theology makes prayer exciting and meaningful. While Classical Theology looks at God as an impersonal unmoved mover who has pre-ordained everything to the minutest detail, is impassable, all of which are thoroughly QUITE UNBIBLICAL, Relational Theology sees The God of Love, a God who loves, a Jealous God, a God who risks, all VERY BIBLICAL concepts either by Biblical declaration or example.

Because God is Love, He has subjected His Sovereignty to His Love. He therefore, has the future open EXCEPT OF COURSE, for those things He has specifically predestined in Scripture like the incarnation, death and resurrection of the Messiah, His Second Coming and various other objects of specific prophecy as narrated in Scripture.

Since the Bible portrays an angry God many times, it is quite obvious that God is NOT impassable. Not only that, His anger means that God is surprised at negative outcomes like the unfaithfulness of His chosen people. Imagine, these are people He CHOSE, and if God Himself becomes disappointed with His OWN choice, this is undisputable proof that God has made much of the future open. He has in fact, by His own choice, locked the future even from Himself. Oh such Love, oh such exercise of Sovereignty, that God is Almighty enough to at least temporarily suspend His Own Sovereignty, or disable absolute sovereignty. On the other hand, oh such absolute Love that He can never suspend nor disable His LOVE!!!

So how does this theological truth affect our prayer life? In Relational Theology, prayer is defined as a request for a Sovereign Divine Intervention from the God of Love. It is asking God to interrupt and change the course of events according to our petitions. Implicitly, it assumes that God has NOT pre-ordained everything and therefore, our prayers and petitions can influence outcomes of events or states of being.

Life has "natural laws" obviously designed (or pre-ordained if you may) by God Himself. For example, take GRAVITY. We know that if you drop a relatively heavy object from the top of a high structure, its natural law is for it to drop vertically (plus or minus wind resistance and direction) to the ground. Prayer is a petition for God to intervene in that "natural law" or natural consequence.

A person may be sick or dying as a natural course of either aging, an accident, or careless stewardship of the body (too much toxic intake coupled with inadequate nutrition, for example). A prayer or petition for healing is a request for God to intervene in the natural course which may include intense suffering and/or death. In fact, it is a request by faith for a loving God to hear and even instantly implement the cure. There are countless biblical examples as well as real life examples of miracle healings, but these are the dynamics of the process or the big picture on what prayer is all about.

Divine forgiveness for our trespasses have the natural consequence of judgment or God's curse. Prayer would be a petition for forgiveness and perhaps a request to suspend the consequences although, biblically, the suspension of the consequences of sin is rare. Many times, the loving God forgives immediately in response to prayer, but the consequences remain and rightly so that His own will be afraid to repeat the offense. Relationally, this is the same as a parent disciplining his children. They are forgiven but a good parent will rarely suspend or cancel the consequences of spanking or grounding.

Relational Theology not only assumes, but KNOWS for sure, that God can change His mind in the same way He changed His mind about the destruction of Nineveh when they hearkened to the warnings of Jonah. (Jonah 3:10) God changed His mind when He declared to Hezekiah that he would die that very day, but after the pleadings and prayers of Hezekiah himself, God changed his mind and gave him fifteen more years! (Isaiah 38:1-8).

This theology is no different from the operative theology of David when it comes to prayer as clearly recorded in 2 Samuel 12:16-17. David prayed and fasted (pleading God to intervene again into the Divinely declared course of events in verse 14, which is the death of the child being borne by Bathsheba). This particular story and situation highlights two important acronyms when it comes to true and correct theology in prayer.

ASK which stands of Ask, Seek, and Knock according to Matthew 7:7, and
PUSH which stands for Pray Until Something Happens! What could happen, of course, could be as obvious as what happened to David, or it could just be an calm assurance that God has heard according to 1 John 5:15, which declares that God hearing EQUALS God answering. However, this latter experience is difficult to sense by someone who is not in relationship or fellowship with God with the same fervency and intensity as David had with the Lord.

Classicists may call this arrogant presumption. Relational Theology calls it simple faith in the Loving God. And God does respond to the prayer of faith. He said so in James 5:15 and 1 John 5:15. We therefore agree with Karl Barth that prayer affects God. However, even Barth's articulation is weak compared to what we just discussed. Many times when we pray, God weeps in the same way that Jesus wept (John 11:35, Isaiah 63:9) and is many times even more eager to grant us our petitions than we are to just kneel down and pray. God wants us to be in relationship - - - intimate, personal, and constant. Classicists fail at intimate and personal. Relationalists fail at constancy. And these are the barriers not only to answered prayer but to the fullness of joy in the Lord's fellowship.

The common classical response to all this discussion on prayer is how about the passage which tells us to "pray according to God's will". I do not wish to blur the message I would like us to derive from this discussion so I prefer to relegate the answer to that point to another blog where we can exegete this properly and thoroughly.

....under development. Come back soon....

Other related topics:

Thursday, January 3, 2008

God Can Change His Mind, and He changes it often in Scripture

Watch out for this exciting discussion and make your prayer life really exciting and meaningful! The classical view, of course, is boring and non-relational since everything has been predestined. They actually believe in the pagan concept of DESTINY!

In Relational Theology, prayer and supplication is simply asking God to intervene in our affairs to change their course or alter the outcome according to our prayer requests. It could also mean "moving the hands of God through prayer" (1 Corinthians 2:16,The Living Bible). But such a train of thought is NOT possible if God was 100% immutable, i.e, not only immutable in character, but also immutable in thoughts and actions and attitudes.

When God created the world, He created natural laws along with it. An example is gravity. Sir Isaac Newton who was a Christian, by the way, said it best when he said: “What goes up must come down”. This means that God set things to go their "natural course" without necessarily His active participation in such an event other than His sustaining power to maintain these natural laws of the universe He created.

What this means, especially in a physical, emotional, spiritual or moral sense, is that by Divine design, events "naturally" lead to other "natural" events or outcomes. This also means that actions will have "natural" consequences. This is why there are Laws of Probability or Predictability. Remember the toss of a fair coin and the toss of a fair die? Anyone can predict that over the long term you have a 50% probability of getting heads or a 1/6th probability of getting a six respectively, and empirical data always proves that such is indeed the outcome. Then this is how mathematical laws get developed, simply because even with the influence of slight chaos in this universe, the natural laws do indeed hold and are theoretically predictable with a great deal of confidence.

God created mortal man with the intention of giving him a long life on earth centered around the Garden of Eden. But the consequence of eating of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil was moral accountability or the loss of innocence. Hence, the fall of man. Man fell from innocence to accountability, from a long life in the presence of God (where mortal death was simply a transition from one state to the next) to a truly mortal life without God where death had to wait for final redemption (and that only for each man that gets reconciled to God through Jesus Christ, while in the mortal state) in order to resume living physically as well as spiritually.

Why do I know this? Because the Bible tells me so.

And, as early as the Creation account, the Bible also tells me that God changed His mind about so many details in His overall immutable divine design for creation as events of history started to unfold. But God is a God of order and not chaos. Hence, even if God allows a little chaos in the chain of historical events, He intervenes many times to preserve His creation. Intervention is nothing other than God making exceptions to natural law by His ACTIVE participation in the historical chain of events to actually change the outcome (and/or make it consistent with His overall plan(s)).

Interestingly, although we see early in the economy of God that He participated quite actively in intervening in the affairs of man, especially to preserve the logical trend of His progressive revelation of Himself to man; we find that as progressive revelation gets more advanced and clearer, God reduces His intervention into human affairs to the point that after the completion of the Judeo-Christian cannon of scripture or written revelation, God rarely, if ever, intervenes in His creative work EXCEPT as a response to the prayers of His people.

Prayer being useful and necessary to change God's mind is discussed under another subject, "Relational Theology Makes Prayer Meaningful". For now, we confine ourselves in just observing the Bible incidents which demonstrate when God changes His mind.

Genesis 3:21 may be the first time, "21 Also for Adam and his wife the LORD God made tunics of skin, and clothed them." Compare this to Genesis 2:25, "25 And they were both naked, the man and his wife, and were not ashamed." God created man and woman to exist a certain way. As a result of the fall which had "natural" consequences including the curse, God starts to demonstrate His omni-competence, i.e., His all-wise, omniscient, effective and efficient response to any arising situation. Nevertheless, He changed His mind about one thing and did something about it.

Immediately after He clothes man, He casts them out of Eden never to return in Genesis 3:22-24:

22 Then the LORD God said, "Behold, the man has become like one of Us, to know good and evil. And now, lest he put out his hand and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live forever" - 23 therefore the LORD God sent him out of the garden of Eden to till the ground from which he was taken. 24 So He drove out the man; and He placed cherubim at the east of the garden of Eden, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to guard the way to the tree of life.

Clearly, His intention was for man initially to live forever in the garden of Eden for He never forbid them from eating of the fruit of the Tree of Life. But God changed His mind after the fall.

Moving on a bit forward, after God sees man going his own way despite His regular presence in their midst, he declares in Genesis 6:3, And the LORD said, "My Spirit shall not strive (abide) with man forever, for he is indeed flesh; yet his days shall be one hundred and twenty years."

So God originally intended to be continually present with man to fellowship with him. He also intended for man to live long. The previous chapter showed an average life-span of from 600 to more than 900 years. However, with God withdrawing His continual presence, He reduced man's life-span to a mere 120 years! By the way, have you noticed that of all the centenarians ever documented and reported, including the Hunza, rarely exceed 120 years of age? Herein is another deviation from the original Divine Design or intention. God changed His mind on these two issues to adjust to unfolding circumstances in His creative work.

In fact, just a few more verses later (v.5-8), we find God relenting that He ever created man, whereas in the 6th day of creation, He declared that everything He created was good. So God again changed His mind about His view of mankind.


... more to follow....

Other related topics: